Dato headless cms how to#
Dato headless cms android#
Dato headless cms software#

There are also other options out there, but looking at the features and concepts, those are the platforms you should have a look at.

Here are some headless CMS options you might like to have a look at to find your best fit: We can find information about WordPress and Drupal and will find that already trying to work their way into going headless or at least offering an API approach.īoth of the above-mentioned options work fine but tries to make the CMS work in a way that they were not initially designed for. In summary, we can say that if we thoroughly research our project and HONESTLY answer the questions in the diagram, we will arrive at the type of CMS that will work best for us.

Dato headless cms how to#

To better understand how to use this diagram, I recommend visiting the blog of Dries Buytaert (its author) by following this link: Just as an example, Dries Buytaert who collaborating with the Drupal community has created and published the following diagram: Some CMS, or the communities that support them, provide a lot of information that helps us correctly choose the type of CMS that will work best with each implementation.

Dato headless cms android#

Because of the headless approach, the content can be used on an iOS app, Android app as well as any platform and technology you can think of and is, therefore, a powerful option for mobile and web developers.

Enrich contents and product information on blogs and e-commerce sites.Īdditionally, a headless CMS is not limited to WebSites, a headless CMS can deliver your content through an API directly to where you need it.

Native Mobile Apps (iOS and/or Android).

Websites created with static site generators (Jekyll, Middleman).Websites, Web apps that use JavaScript frameworks (VueJS, ReactJS, etc).Build a website with a technology you are familiar with.To help you decide, let’s have a look at the benefits really quick:Įxplaining a bit better and trying to extend this table, we could say that the most commonly heard use cases for headless CMS are: There are use cases where one CMS outstands the other and vice versa. The answer to this question is quite simple, but it won’t help you much: It depends on your requirements. There could be high upfront costs associated with developing the front end of the system.A headless CMS is more complicated to configure and deploy than a coupled CMS.Even if the back end experiences downtime, the front end continues to operate without any hurdles.

Dato headless cms software#

Software upgrades affect only the CMS application, not the live website.You can publish files on third-party destinations and conceal the back end of the website, making it difficult for hackers to attack your website. Headless CMS delivers content faster than coupled CMS due to its architecture.Hackers could enter the back end of the admin portal and that could pose a potential risk to the front end of your website. A monolithic CMS is not as secure as other architectures.Scaling the infrastructure is a challenge as it depends on database scalability.Customizing the front end of the website can be a challenge with coupled CMS because it provides limited options to customize the UX/UI.Because they are simple to manage, it is ideal for single sites.A monolithic CMS does not require extensive investment in infrastructure most of them need just a hosting account.Therefore it is easier to optimize pages for Google page speed and even relaunch parts of the website without needing to care about the content. Therefore, the developer must craft the website by his- or herself and use the Content Delivery API of the headless CMS to load the content.Ĭreating the whole website on their own seems like a big task on the list, but by decoupling the CMS from the front-end a developer can choose any technology they are already familiar with and do not need to learn the technology for that specific CMS.Īnother big bonus is the fact that one developer can also focus on their own work without handling the bugs of an already existing stack of technology. A headless CMS separated the head from its stack and therefore lacks this point by design. Other than using a monolithic CMS, one website can’t be built only with a headless CMS.